home

Archive for August, 2004

Special Characters

Tuesday, August 31st, 2004

It hath pleased Blogger this morning to deprive me of my special characters. Two years of posts are now adorned with jumbled character strings that make it look like I’m swearing.

In the future, expect me to be a little less dash-happy, and perhaps a little less fastidious when it comes to matters acute, circumflex, grave, and umlaut. (Coincidentally, I recently came across a good pop-up application for adding special characters, so at least I can fix them if I manage to find them.)

At any rate, for the time being, please note that my references to Louise Gl¿½ck don’t reflect any dissatisfaction with our former poet laureate.

Coffee with OGIC

Tuesday, August 31st, 2004

Chicago literary bloggers are a solitary lot. In fact, when our phones ring we usually pick them up and shout, à la Nelson Algren: “WRONG NUMBER!”

Nevertheless, we do emerge from our redoubts now and then, blinking in the unfamiliar sunshine. On such a day recently, I spent a few hours in Hyde Park in the company of that international woman of mystery, Our Girl in Chicago (OGIC). She agreed to meet me only if I came down to our meeting place blindfolded via taxi, with the taxi driver also blindfolded except for when passing though intersections.

I arrived at the cafe a little early, at which point I remembered that I had no idea what OGIC looked like. The sole image I’d seen was not unlike Cecil Beaton’s famous photograph of Henry Green.

After several minutes inspecting the back of many an innocent woman’s head, I decided to call OGIC’s cell phone. Voila. She said she was on her way, and she described herself so I could recognize her. Shortly after we hung up, an elderly Hispanic woman entered wearing the outfit OGIC described. Who could have guessed? Alas, she didn’t respond to any of my subtle attempts to catch her eye.

Soon, the real OGIC arrived—though really, how would I know?—and she identified me immediately by what I was reading. The TLS—my version of a red carnation.

We talked about a lot of things, including:

* Hyde Park, as habitat and state of mind
* Las Vegas, the spectacle of
* Television, her peculiar fascination with
* Book reviews, admired and otherwise
* The Tribune: getting better?
* “Bloggers I have known”

and, of course, books.

Naturally we went to a bookshop afterwards—in fact, two. First we walked to 57th Street Books, where, picking up Ward Just’s new book, OGIC asked the shrewd question my radio review failed to answer: “Finer than Just’s other books, or another fine book by Just?”

She showed me Imagining Argentina by Lawrence Thornton, and I remarked how great it was that you could read all kinds of novels for three decades and still find well-known, respected, productive novelists writing in your own language whom you’ve never heard of. Afterwards we walked over to the Seminary Co-op Bookstore, a bittersweet experience when you don’t have several hours to browse.

I needed to head back up north, so we walked back across the campus to the hospital, where the cabs queue up. I thought to myself how people living in different parts of Chicago—north, west, south—really live in different cities and have few opportunities to meet unless they actively seek them out. The fact that I hadn’t met OGIC til now seemed very strange indeed.

Anyhow, thanks to OGIC for making time to get together with a fugitive north-sider. Now I feel like rereading all her posts on About Last Night

Poets Behaving Badly

Tuesday, August 31st, 2004

I’ll have to check with the literary historians on this one, but it seems to me that Wordsworth’s axiom no longer applies. Somehow still kicking around in their 30s and 40s, today’s poets are demonstrating that there’s a prolonged phase in between “gladness” and “madness” that those of us without a good rhyming dictionary might call “badness.”

The latest issue of the Chicago Review (combined 49:3/4 and 50:1) contains Andrea Brady’s response to Don Paterson’s vitriolic introduction to New British Poetry. Says Brady, “Paterson has only made himself look petty and foolish.”

Elsewhere, the NB column in the August 20 TLS wonders at the relative obscurity of the new US poet laureate. (I confess I didn’t know him either.) Poet August Kleinzahler says the selection process stinks, too:

The next poet laureate of the United States is to be Ted Kooser. James H. Billington of the Library of Congress, which organizes the selection, describes Kooser as “a major poetic voice for rural and small town American and the first poet laureate chosen from the Great Plains.” We asked the poetry editor of the TLS what he thought of the new US poet laureate. He had never heard of him. We turned to the Editor of the Poetry Review. “Who is Ted Kooser?” Alarmed at the prospect of an outbreak of unPoundian provincialism in London, we rang the American poet August Kleinzahler, winner of the Griffin Prize. Surely he had heard of Ted Kooser. “Not before I saw the announcement.” Mr. Kleinzahler then made the heretical suggestion that those in charge of the appointment “are not interested in talented poets.”

Philip Larkin

Tuesday, August 31st, 2004

From the Selected Letters of Philip Larkin, 1940-1985, as quoted in Penelope Fitzgerald The Afterlife: Essays and Criticism:

A poem is just a thought of the imagination—not really logical at all. In fact I should like to make it quite clear to my generation and all subsequent generations that I have no ideas about poetry at all. For me, a poem is the crossroads of my thoughts, my feelings, my imaginings, my wishes, and my verbal sense: normally these run parallel . . . often two or more cross . . . but only when all cross at one point does one get a poem.

Fall Literary Season

Monday, August 30th, 2004

If you listened to Hello Beautiful! on WBEZ this weekend, you heard me give a little preview of literary events coming up this fall. This was my fourth segment for the show; I previously did pieces on Irene Zabytko, Ward Just, and Allen Seager (all audio links).

Between now and mid-December really is the busiest time of the year for literary events in Chicago. I added another twenty or so items to my upcoming events list yesterday, when the Chicago Humanities Festival released its full schedule. Among the writers coming to town over the next 90 days are:

Maya Angelou
Louis de Bernieres
T. Coraghessan Boyle
Russell Banks
E. L. Doctorow
Roddy Doyle
James Fenton
Alan Furst
Neal Gaiman
William Gibson
Louise Glück
Andrew Sean Greer
Robert Hass
Shirley Hazzard
Edward P Jones
Ward Just
William Kennedy
Maxine Hong Kingston
Galway Kinnell
David Lodge
Alice McDermott
Sue Miller
Pankaj Mishra
Bharati Mukherjee
Paul Muldoon
Joyce Carol Oates
Nuala O’Faolain
Sharon Olds
CynthiaOzick
Ann Patchett
Luis Rodriguez
Marjane Satrapi
Roger Shattuck
Norman Sherry
Paul Theroux
August Wilson
Tom Wolfe

Time to begin your planning …

ADDITION 9/1: The archive recording of my radio segment on this topic just went up today.

In the Locals

Sunday, August 29th, 2004

Didn’t take me long to cover the literary items in the Sun-Times and Tribune this weekend:

* in the Sun-Times, Roger K. Miller admires Arthur Phillips’s The Egyptologist: “The author deftly shifts back and forth among a half-dozen voices and styles. He states in comments at the back of his book that when he set out to write it he knew absolutely nothing about Egyptology. That makes the audacity of his creation as great as that of his protagonist’s, and the success of it even greater.”

* Also in the ST, Githa Hariharan’s In Times of Siege gets a brief thumbs-up from Delores and Roger Flaherty: “In Times of Siege successfully pulls together this theme of personal struggle along with comment on current affairs in India and observation on the uses and perversions of history. The author does it with subtlety and great good humor, making Shiv Murthy someone we can easily like and understand.”

* Sadly, the Trib’s books page largely overlooks literary fiction and poetry this week. However, I enjoyed the piece on one of my favorite local blues artists, Lurrie Bell.

Thomas Chatterton

Friday, August 27th, 2004

Ok, let me get this straight: Thomas Chatterton didn’t commit suicide. It’s just that, when he was poisoning himself, he poisoned himself too much.

It was on the night of August 24-25 that Chatterton died in his garret in London. It was established that the cause of death was arsenic poisoning and an inquest declared he had committed suicide in a fit of madness.

A popular and enduring image arose of a neglected genius who took his own life at a young age – driven to despair by poverty and bitterness at his failure to get published.

However, Dr. Nick Groom of Bristol University’s Department of English has begun to challenge that image, arguing instead that all the evidence suggests the overdose was accidental.

“Reports of Chatterton’s madness by Robert Southey and other Romantic poets were gradually exaggerated in the years after his death,” explained Dr. Groom.

David Lodge

Tuesday, August 24th, 2004

I really enjoyed Julia Llewellyn’s profile of novelist David Lodge in Monday’s Telegraph. Incidentally, Lodge will be appearing in Chicago at the Humanities Fest in November.

We are sitting in Lodge’s immaculate study, in his modern house in genteel Edgbaston. Aged 69, Lodge is certainly an uneffusive character: compact, dressed in a baggy cardigan, with caterpillar brows and a tight hyphen of a mouth.Yet his reserve is accompanied by subtle humour and – when he talks about his family – a touching openness. What some perceive as coldness, is, I suspect, more the result of his increasing deafness. He wears a hearing aid, but still is apt to misunderstand or simply ignore you.

“I hate my deafness; it’s a comic infirmity as opposed to blindness which is a tragic infirmity,” he sighs.

Pierced by a sense of my neighbor’s misfortune

Monday, August 16th, 2004

“On a Beach,” from Czeslaw Milosz, Provinces: Poems 1987-1991, translated by the author and Robert Hass:

The sea breaks on the sands, I listen to its surge and
close my eyes,

Here on this European shore, in the fullness of summer, after
the big wars of the century.

The brows of new generations are innocent, yet marked.

Often in a crowd a face resembling — he could be one of the
destroyers

If he were born a little earlier but he doesn’t know it.

Chosen, as his father was, though not called.

Under my eyelids I keep their eternally young cities.

The shouts of their music, the rock pulsating, I am searching
for the core of my thought.

It is only what can’t be expressed, the “ah” mumbled
every day–

The irretrievable, indifferent, eternal vanishing?

Is it pity and anger because after ecstasy and despair and
hope beings similar to gods are swallowed by oblivion?

Because in the sea’s surging and silences once hears nothing about a
division into the just and the wicked?

Or was I pursued by images of those who were alive
for a day, an hour, a moment under the skies?

So much, and now the peace of defeat, for my verse has
preserved so little?

Or perhaps I have only heard myself whispering: “Epilogue, epilogue”?

Prophecies of my youth fulfilled but not in the way one expected.

The morning is back, and the flowers are gathered in the cool of the
garden by a loving hand.

A flock of pigeons soars above the valley. They turn and change
color flying along the mountains.

Same glory of ordinary days and milk in a jug and crisp cherries.

And yet down below, in the very brushwood of existence, it lurks
and crawls,

Recognizable by the fluttering dread of small creatures, it,
implacable, steel-gray nothingness.

. . .

I open my eyes, a ball flies past, a red sail leans on a wave which is
blue in the gaudy sun.

Just before me a boy tests the water with his foot, and suddenly
I notice he is not like the others.

Not crippled, yet he has the movements of a cripple and the
head of a retarded child.

His father looks after him, that handsome man sitting there
on a boulder.

A sensation of my neighbor’s misfortune pierces me and I begin
to comprehend

In this dark age the bond of our common fate and a compassion
more real than I was inclined to confess.

Czeslaw Milosz Is Dead

Saturday, August 14th, 2004

Czeslaw Milosz, thought by many to be preeminent among living poets, has died at age 93. Some of the coverage is below (updated 8/15/04).

Czeslaw Milosz, Poet and Nobelist Who Wrote of Modern Cruelties, Dies at 93 (NYT)
Nobel poet Czeslaw Milosz of Poland and Berkeley, one of the icons of the Solidarity movement, dies (UC Berkeley Press Release)
Requiem for a Poet: Czeslaw Milosz (NPR Audio)
Czeslaw Milosz, 1911-2004: Nobel poet, UC prof – Voice of moral clarity (SF Chronicle)
Polish Poet Czeslaw Milosz, 93, Dies (Washington Post)
Bernard Lane: World according to Milosz (The Australian)
Nobel Laureate Czeslaw Milosz Dead at 93 (Voice of America)
Nobel laureate poet Milosz dies (BBC News)
Nobel Literature Laureate Czeslaw Milosz Dies (Scotsman)
Poland’s Nobel Laureate Milosz Dead at 93 (Reuters)
Nobel literature laureate dies (CNN)
Nobel Laureate Poet Czeslaw Milosz Dies (Guardian/AP)
Nobel laureate Czeslaw Milosz dies (CBC)Â